Latest Posts

Plans for Supporters Direct Cymru unveiled

Dan Rose, head of England and Wales Supporters’ Direct, spoke to members of the National Assembly about community ownership of sports clubs during a visit to Cardiff.

He was the main speaker at an All-Party Committee on Co-operative and Mutuals hosted by Pontypridd AM Mick Antoniw. Chair Tim Hartley and board member Phillip Nifield represented Cardiff City Supporters’ Trust.

Dan stressed the importance of football clubs which, he described, as the heartbeat of the community. He argued Wales was ripe for community ownership of sports clubs and also revealed plans to set up a Supporters Direct Cymru.

Dan also highlighted the position in Germany where many football clubs in the Bundesliga are 50% + 1 owned by fans who had a large say in issues like ticket prices.

Supporters Direct development manager, Kevin Rye, gave examples of community ownership of clubs in England while Meurig Price spoke about how the Merthyr Town Supporters’ Trust  had turned around the club with support from Supporters Direct and the local council. He explained the 3D pitch fitted last year was now used seven days a week by the community.

Rhondda AM Leighton Andrews, who is a founding member of the Trust, pledged to press the case with the Welsh Government to adopt the Localism Act which would allow sports grounds to be designated as assets of community value. It has already been adopted in England with Old Trafford and Anfield among the famous grounds already designated.

He stressed the importance of supporters’ trusts and their activities and praised the way the Cardiff Trust had acted over the behind-the-scenes problems at Cardiff Citydurintg the past few weeks.

Statement on name change from fans of Hull City

The Trust has already declared its support for fans fighting to keep the name Hull City. They issued an appeal today for support to all Premier League Trusts.

The Tigers Co-operative Says No To ‘Hull Tigers’!

The owner of Hull City AFC, Assem Allam wishes to change the playing name of our football club to ‘Hull Tigers.’  The request to make this change has been lodged with The Football Association and a review of that request is imminent.  Our supporter’s trust is part of the City Till We Die campaign which opposes this change.  We urge your trust to support us.

Should this change of name be allowed to come about it opens the way to more cheap gimmicks in the interests of possible short term gains for football club owners.  It could be your football club’s turn next to suffer from the whims and caprices of present or future unknown owners.

The Tigers Co-operative is one of the oldest independent football supporters’ trusts in the United Kingdom as well as being Hull City’s oldest existing supporters’ organisation.  It was formed in 1998 as a one-member one vote mutual organisation during an ownership crisis.  The great majority of our members have been with us for over ten years, many since the very beginning.

We regard our football club and its name, Hull City Association Football Club as an essential part of the culture and fabric of our local community.  In 2017 the city of Hull will be the United Kingdom’s City of Culture.  Our football club should take a full part in those celebrations despite it ignoring the City of Hull’s campaign to achieve this special status.  In all probability the real motivation to change the name lies in a spat between our club owner and the Hull City Council over the ownership of the KC Stadium.  Hence his dislike of our name, Hull City.  On gaining promotion to the Premier League our owner rejected the council’s offers of an open top bus parade of the city and civic reception for the team.  Our Premier League football club should be celebrating the name ‘City’ not trying to erase it.

In the 21st century as a post industrial society the United Kingdom’s unique selling proposition to the world is its heritage.  Hull City AFC and its name are as much part of that heritage as any listed building or national park.  One of the founding fathers of association football 150 years ago, Ebenezer Cobb Morley was born in Hull.

Our football club’s present name is a ‘brand,’ – for want of a better word – which has survived since 1904.  In some of those years it has continued to exist despite severely adverse conditions.  It has come back from the dead twice, mainly because the local and national communities wanted it to.  The name of our football club should not be discarded as easily as the name of a chocolate bar or a kitchen cleaner for the sake of some pie in the sky quick fix.  The name Hull City is an essential part of our community’s identity in this country and the world.

The proposed name change has been submitted to The Football Association without any consultation with our club’s supporters despite requests for this to take place.  These requests have been ignored.  We, the Tigers Co-operative conducted a ballot of our members in October 2013 on the renaming issue in which more than two-thirds (67.5%) of all Tigers Co-op members voted.  We asked ‘should Hull City AFC be renamed ‘Hull Tigers’?’  The result was that 95.1% disagreed with the owner’s proposed change of name.  The same percentage agreed that the Tigers Co-op should be actively involved in the campaign to protect our football club’s name.

Other polls have been conducted.  Not one of them shows any significant measure of support for changing the name of our football club from the existing one.  In fact, each one has shown quite the opposite opinion by large majorities.

Following our ballot the Tigers Co-op has been an active member in the City Till We Die campaign to protect our football club’s identity.

It is suggested that changing the name of our football club will raise its profile especially in the Asian market and create new revenue streams.  However, there is no independent evidence to support this theory.  Indeed renowned marketing experts have said that such a move is unlikely to produce any extra revenue and may well cost the football club financially by alienating a large section of its existing customer base.

Any expression of contrary views to the renaming of the club has led to derisory comments against the supporters by the club’s owner calling us ‘hooligans’ and telling us we can ‘die if we want to!’  Despite this the Tigers Co-operative, like all other Hull City supporter groups, has remained supportive of everything else the club has achieved under its present ownership.

Members of the City Till We Die campaign group are invited to attend a meeting with a sub-committee of The Football Association Council on 3rd February 2014 to discuss the issue.  We ask your football supporters’ trusts to back our campaign to maintain the name Hull City Association Football Club and reject the proposal made to The Football Association to change it to ‘Hull Tigers.’

Thank you.

Frank Beill

Acting Chairman of the Tigers Co-operative

Bluebirds and the Scholars meet

Pictured are John Franklyn and Tim Hartley

Pictured are John Franklyn and Tim Hartley

Twenty supporters from Chasetown FC enjoyed a day out at the City for the West Ham match.

The ‘Scholars’ enjoyed some light refreshments at Mavericks before we walked together to the stadium. The Trust and Supporters’ Club have maintained our relationship with the Staffordshire club since our 3rd round FA game against them in 2008, the year we reached the final.

John Franklyn,Chair of the Chasetown Supporters Club, said, “On behalf of the club, can I thank you for your wonderful gift of the framed signed shirt that will be hung in our club room this week as a further reminder of the wonderful bond that has developed between the two clubs and also for the pens presented to each of our supporters that made the trip.

“Can we wish Cardiff City and all of your supporters a great end to this season that they truly deserve. On a personal note it was great to see you again and long may that continue. Your next visit to us was being discussed over a beer in Chasetown last night.”

Trust chair Tim Hartley said: “It was great to meet John and all the Scholars again despite Saturday’s disappointing result. They gave us a warm welcome when we visited Chasetown last year and it was lovely to be able to repay their hospitality. Thanks to the club for providing our visitors with tickets and to Eric and Linda at Mavericks for the pre-match curry. We look forward to renewing our ‘friendship through football’ with the Scholars very soon.”

 

CCFC’s Accounts to May 2013

The Trust has accessed CCFC’s accounts to May 2013 which were today made available at Companies House. Here are the main points:

·        Income is down from £20m to £17m. In 2012 we made the Carling Cup final so we had extra income in that year.

·        Losses are up from £13m to £30m. This is a real cause for concern.

·        The cost of sales (mainly player costs) are up from £21m to £34m. This includes promotion bonuses of £4m.

·        Administrative costs more than doubled from £7.5m to £15.9m. There is no explanation in the accounts as to why this has happened (other than £900k promotion bonuses) and we will be taking this up with the club.

·        Total debts of the company are up from £84m to £118m, of which £113m is payable by 31st of May 2014. Of that £113m, £66m is due to Vincent Tan (up from £37m in the previous year), £16m is due to Langston, £2.3m to the Player Fund and £1.5m to PMG. Both PMG and the Player Fund have since been paid off.

·        Langston were owed £34m. That figure is made up of a £20m debt, £9m naming rights and £5m promotion bonus. This debt has now been settled for a total of £22m (that is £15m for the above plus a balance of £7m over 7 years at £1m a year. So Langston ultimately took a write-off of £12m.)

Despite the reduction in the Langston debt and Vincent Tan writing off £5m of interest he had previously charged the club, the losses have still rocketed up, including the big unexplained increase in administration costs.

So even though we made it to the Premier League we had a balance sheet deficit at 31 May 2013 of £56.3m compared to £28.1m at 31 May 2012. What price success eh? We will of course be asking the club to explain these figures in detail when we meet them.

 

Ole Gunnar Solskjaer

Commenting on the appointment of Ole Gunnar Solskjaer as manager of Cardiff City, Cardiff City Supporters’ Trust said today:

“Ole Gunnar Solskjaer is an exciting appointment as the new Cardiff City manager. It is important that he is now left to get on with the difficult task of ensuring the Bluebirds’ status as a Premier League club is secured. We wish him well.

“Given what has happened at the club over the last couple of months, there is need for a period of stability. It is important that fans get behind the new manager and players as they strive to move up the Premier League table.

“Following Ole Gunnar’s appointment, we trust Mr Tan will now fulfil his pledge to meet the Trust and the Supporters’ Club to discuss a range of issues which fans are concerned about. We hope Mr Tan will also look to build bridges with supporters.

“It is absolutely crucial that regular dialogue takes place between Mr Tan, supporter organisations and the fans generally.”